In case
you’re one of the three or four people who don’t know, Timothy McVeigh
was executed early this morning. The news cycle contained nothing else
today. I was thinking of writing about sexist trends in television or the
true nature of Generation X. But I decided I’ve ducked this one long enough.
I have
refrained from commenting on McVeigh for years now. I guess I’ve been waiting
to see how it all turned out. From the beginning, it’s been an odd case,
certainly a monstrous disaster, and a very telling episode in our nation’s
history.
Let me
tell you a few stories:
• Today,
guerrillas took 15 people hostage in the Phillippines, adding to the 13
people they already have captive. Among the new hostages are two 12-year-olds.
They burned down five houses and a chapel.
• Today,
a five-month-old baby boy died in Jerusalem, the son of Jewish settlers,
who was hit in a Palestinian stoning attack. He joins a 10-month-old Israeli
girl in Hebron who was shot by a Palestinian sniper and a four-month-old
Palestinian girl killed by an Israeli tank shell is Gaza. Among many others.
A thousand people demonstrated with the baby’s corpse, demanding retaliations.
That was
just today.
You want
some more?
• In Bosnia,
they’ve found the remains of more than 4,000 piled up in an underground
tunnel. It’s being described as the worst civilian massacre since World
War II. More than 8,000 Muslims are believed to have been executed and
dumped here. More than a thousand remain unidentified. There are 12 more
mass graves that we know about that have yet to be opened, as many as a
thousand more people, more than 1,600 remain missing from a single town.
Jasmin Odobasic, deputy head of the Muslim commission, said, ‘‘looking
down, one cannot see the bottom, only where the pile of bones starts.’’
I would
never want to diminish the pain felt by the people of Oklahoma City, those
who lost their children and family members in the explosion. It was a horrific
act of terrorism, not only against our government, but against the peace
and dignity of the United States.
Here’s
the rub: There are horrific acts of terrorism every single day somewhere
in the world. We don’t care about them because they’re not us. How the
rest of the world must sneer at us, obsessed with the Oklahoma City bombing
because such things never happen to us. We dismiss the bombing-of-the-day
in Israel and Palestine because we’re so insulated in our little corner
of the world that we forget tragedy does happen, terrorism is real, innocent
people are killed every day, and if none of them are American, it won’t
make the news.
I could
talk forever about the Middle East, and it’s so much fun to blame all the
terrorism of the world on them. But remember something the media has conveniently
forgotten: for several hours after the Murrah Building exploded, all the
news outlets were yammering about Middle Eastern terrorism brought to the
American heartland. They ALL had to eat crow when it turned out a good
ol’ American boy blew up those children.
But enough
of perspective. Let’s talk about the death penalty. McVeigh has brought
the question back, albeit briefly. I personally don’t believe in it, for
a number of reasons. If you do or if you don’t, please read the rest of
this. We can only discuss if first we listen.
1) It
provides no closure whatsoever to the victims. Certainly, it is distressing
to think that your child’s killer is still alive. But killing him doesn’t
bring back the child, and falsely promoting the “closure” they will receive
causes much more psychological damage to these poor people.
I took
an incredibly unscientific poll on a web community to which I belong. Here
are the preliminary results to my question: Should Timothy McVeigh have
been executed?
• No,
the death penalty is wrong, even for McVeigh - 40 percent
• Yes,
he was a murderer and deserved to die - 35 percent
• No,
now we'll never know who else was involved in the bombing. - 15 percent
• No,
McVeigh was innocent. - 10 percent
• Yes,
the families deserved closure. - 0 percent.
2) It
is much more expensive to execute someone than to keep him in prison for
the rest of his life. That statistic has been stated over and over, yet
people keep denying it. True, it seems impossible. But consider this: there’s
about 3,600 people on death row throughout the U.S. Guess what? That’s
out of 1,932,000 people in prison nationwide, and the number is expected
to hit 2 million this year, according to the U.S. Department of Justice.
That is a negligible impact on the cost-effectiveness of prisons.
But total
up the cost of the appeals process involved in a death-penalty case, the
maintenance of death rows, arranging for the family and witnesses, the
execution itself... You do the math. And that’s per person; imagine what
Texas must spend on executions, when they executed a stunning 37 people
last year, a record-breaking number that appeared almost nowhere in print.
Under then-Gov. Shrub, 157 people were executed.
3) Sooner
or later, we’re going to screw up and execute the innocent. Many argue
this has already happened. It very well may have. The stunning incompetancy
of the FBI in failing to turn over thousands of obviously pertinent documents
in the McVeigh case should be proof enough that bungling is common. For
heaven’s sake, this was only the most important prosecution in the last
decade, and even then they couldn’t get the rules right? Little things
like a possible third bomber and a potential alibi (most likely false)
for McVeigh were “irrelevant?”
As much
as I like to dance around and crow about the morons in Washington, they're
not this stupid. There is a reason they didn't hand over this evidence
before. Part of it, I imagine, is the absolute need for a scapegoat to
personify the evil of the bombing and be the sacrificial lamb. McVeigh
suits it perfectly, because he was intricately involved and totally remorseless.
At any
rate, from a legal point of view, those documents are clearly relevant
and should have been handed over. They detail massive evidence of additional
conspirators, possible exoneration evidence, alternate theories of the
crime.
4) Death
is too good for them.
This is
one most people disagree with. Oh, they go on and on about the country-club
prisons, cable TV and exercise rooms as they enjoy a happy existence. Spare
me. I’ve seen prisons. They’re worse than your junior high school, and
the other kids in gym class are in for rape and murder. Prison is prison,
and no matter how gilded the bars, you're still sleeping a few feet from
a mass murderer with nothing to lose.
In my
humble opinion, execution was far too good for McVeigh. It's true that
there are human monsters, and McVeigh certainly qualifies. But I have never
supported killing them. There are far better punishments.
McVeigh's
act was to protest what he perceived to be the tyranny of government.
So we should have let him spend the rest of his natural life in a maximum-security
Oklahoma prison. Let him spend the rest of his life finding out what
REAL loss of freedom is. Let him be subject, every moment of every day,
to the government he hates so much. Don’t make him a martyr to the cause
of governmental oppression; let him grow old behind cinderblock walls.
And let
the inmates of Oklahoma mete out their own justice.
5) Finally,
there’s one that is both specific to McVeigh and can be extended to other
legally-sane yet obviously nuts people who have committed heinous crimes.
McVeigh was obviously not alone - hush, FBI, we know damned well that boy
was not capable of planning this assault on his own.
Did you
know that McVeigh called a white-supremacy compound, asking for one of
the leaders, the day before the bombing? Of course not. He must have been
calling for the weather. I didn’t find out about this because of McVeigh
coverage, of course. That would have been responsible journalism. I found
out about it through the obituary of the leader of the compound. He died
of natural causes on his compound, shortly before McVeigh filed his last-minute
appeals.
Another
angry lone nut commits an act of terrorism or assassination, but he did
it alone, and no one will follow him. Of course. We’ve never heard this
story before. Apparently we’re as stupid now as we were in the 1960s.
Too bad.
The prospect of a life of torture, virtual slavery and forcible sodomy
might have made McVeigh cough up whatever intelligence he might have had
about the militia movement in America. And there’s a hell of a lot of them
out there. They’re not just on compounds in Montana; they’re on the internet,
they’re in three-piece suits, they’re in high school cafeterias.
They are
a clear and present danger to civilians in America. They feel that the
government has lost touch with its people, and certainly there’s arguments
to that effect. They see themselves as the descendents of the patriots
on Boston Common, and there’s nothing scarier than a fool with a cause.
Ruby Ridge
and Waco have infuriated them, and they're not done yet. That concerns
me a hell of a lot more than McVeigh, who would never be able to hurt anyone
again from Supermax.
How does
this relate beyond McVeigh? This occurred to me after I read that Theodore
Kasczynski, otherwise known as the Unabomber, became friends with McVeigh
in Supermax. (There’s a pairing that ought to chill your blood.) Tim and
Ted became rather close. They have some politicial beliefs in common, of
course, as well as rather antisocial tendencies. But Ted decried the bombing,
said it was unnecessarily violent. Go figure.
Then I
was watching a movie starring Sigourney Weaver as a housebound psychiatrist
who studies serial killers, I believe the movie was called “Copycat.” She
said she believed the best disposition of serial killers was to lock them
up and study them, a la Hannibal Lecter. Okay, maybe not the best example,
but hey, that was fiction. In reality, Ted Kasczynski is never leaving
Supermax. If Jeffrey Dahmer had been put in there, he’d be there still
(talk about prison justice. They tortured him for two years and killed
him.)
But behind
bars, the shrinks and experts in Behavioral Science at the FBI can study
them, find out how they tick, which helps them catch the next psychotic
bomber or serial killer who comes along.
There
are so many ways we could better have honored the 168 people who
died at the Murrah building other than this anticlimactic ritual sacrifice.
It’s good politics, it satisfies the mob mentality, it’s a few short steps
away from the rope at the tree on the edge of town. But whatever McVeigh
knew about the bombing, about the militia movements in America, whatever
dark secrets he held in his diseased brain, he took with him this morning.
And we
must wait for the next one.
|